Failed study [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by myy – Germany, 2014-03-08 22:40 (4488 d 15:01 ago) – Posting: # 12582
Views: 11,903

❝ Since the test product fails to meet only the lower end of the criteria for AUC 0-t it is not truely bioinequivalent. Could it be possible that bioinequivalence was demonstrated accidentally although the two products are

❝ actually bioequivalent? How could this be proven?


❝ Careful with the terminology. Bioinequivalence was not shown. Your product could be BE, it has just not been demonstrated. Bioinequivalence is only if the CI is entirely outside the acceptance range.


Could this also be argued in front of regulatory authorities?

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
137 visitors (0 registered, 137 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:42 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists cannot simply hang their subjectivities
up on a hook outside the laboratory door.    Ruth Bleier

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5