Failed Fed study on Indapamide MR [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Clarc Homepage – Romania, 2013-11-20 11:59 (4190 d 21:45 ago) – Posting: # 11925
Views: 10,191

Dear luvblooms

❝ a) what was the Tmax observed for fasting and fed study (for test and reference both)? Was there a wide differene?


In FED state:
Tmax (mean) - Test: 9.8846 / Reference: 7.5385
In Fasting:
Tmax (mean) - Test: 14.308 / Reference: 13.962

❝ b) Is there any plan to re-do the fasting study again?


As far as I know, the answer is NO.

❝ c) ... Does your formulation has any release controlling excipient which shows food effect? And What is the release mechanism (through erosion and/or diffusion or any other mechanism?)


Yes it has, HPMC. The release mechanism is mostly erosion, but diffusion is implied too.

❝ d) Can you also let us know the time points used in the stduy? Since you AUC inf is higher ~138%, so there might be some issue related to the sampling time points (Kel not measured properly).


Blood samples had been harvested: pre-dose (0.0) and 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0, 11.0, 12.0, 14.0, 16.0, 24.0, 36.0, 48.0, and 72.0 hours

❝ e) Was there any period effect? I know it is long shot but still it could give you some idea for AUC inf if there is a difference in Kel observed in different periods.


The calculated period effect for Cmax was: 0.717 (NS)

Clarc

I'm always tryin' to do something new, tryin' to look like a beginner.
Meshell Ndegeocello

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,671 registered users;
81 visitors (0 registered, 81 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:45 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you shut your door to all errors
truth will be shut out.    Rabindranath Tagore

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5