Failed Fed study on Indapamide MR [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Clarc Homepage – Romania, 2013-11-20 08:28 (4595 d 04:56 ago) – Posting: # 11922
Views: 14,592

Dear All

Thank You for the replies

Dear El Maestro

❝ So I can't conclude anything, but I would investigate this if I were you; in particular I'd look at the raw data from the bioanalysis, esp. chromatograms.


We have looked at the raw data, and the chromatograms too. Unfortunately the data tells me, that Cmax for the test drug, is lower in 25 of 26 volunteers, and it's under 75% of the reference Cmax, in about 20 volunteers.

To be more specific, and to complete the data: the AUC has made it, however the %AUCextra didn't.

Geomean Ratio (Test/Reference) = 1.38161
(around the ratio:[test form]/[ref form])=[1.1131,1.7149]


Clarc

I'm always tryin' to do something new, tryin' to look like a beginner.
Meshell Ndegeocello

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
182 visitors (0 registered, 182 guests [including 66 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:24 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5