I thought I have seen everything [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2013-08-20 20:09 (4694 d 01:14 ago) – Posting: # 11323
Views: 8,748

Hi Helmut!

❝ ❝ […] Tada, some CRO managed to screw up some early timepoint collection by as much as 35mins!


❝ That’s a fucking lot! What happened? Normaly time deviations outside an “allowance window” stated in the protocol must be not only documented as such but also a comment in the CRF should be given justifiying the event. 35min?!


4 out of 30 subjects had this fiasco. Get this one --> Sampling time at 3.5 and 4.0 hour... They were late 35 mins for the 3.5 (meaning it crossed over into the 4 hr timepoint). They then draw a 4 hr timepint sample with a delay of 11 mins (It's obvious why, they didn't want to miss collecting a sample!!!)So now I have a 3.5hr sample with a +35min deviation and a 4 hr with a +11min deviation!!! what should I use for PAUC0-4??????

Reason for deviation? Couldn't get blood from sites of puncture! 35mins!???? how many time did they poke on the subjects arm(s)!!!!!
I wouldn't have gone ballistic if the reason was "Subject went into hiding somewhere in the dosing area"

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
360 visitors (0 registered, 360 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:23 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Don’t compromise yourself.
You are all you’ve got.    Janis Joplin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5