Carved in stone? [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by sam – India, 2013-08-02 09:02 (4706 d 03:31 ago) – Posting: # 11161
Views: 30,513

❝ Really? If your ratio and CV are just 0.02% (!!) worse, your power would already be <80%. Remember that outcomes of pilot studies are estimates, not set in stone. Planing for 80% power – hoping for exactly matching the pilot and face not a single drop-out in such a large study – is gambling as well.*


Its real.

❝ * In the pivotal study PE ↓ 83.82%, CV ↑ 27%, and you had 14 drop-outs…


very correct.

Also confirm me if i do redosing study and it confirms the outlier. should i present the data without that subjects as discussed by John.

Regards

Sam

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
157 visitors (0 registered, 157 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:34 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5