Carved in stone? [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by sam – India, 2013-08-02 09:02 (4712 d 09:55 ago) – Posting: # 11161
Views: 30,583

❝ Really? If your ratio and CV are just 0.02% (!!) worse, your power would already be <80%. Remember that outcomes of pilot studies are estimates, not set in stone. Planing for 80% power – hoping for exactly matching the pilot and face not a single drop-out in such a large study – is gambling as well.*


Its real.

❝ * In the pivotal study PE ↓ 83.82%, CV ↑ 27%, and you had 14 drop-outs…


very correct.

Also confirm me if i do redosing study and it confirms the outlier. should i present the data without that subjects as discussed by John.

Regards

Sam

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
267 visitors (0 registered, 267 guests [including 23 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:58 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Don’t compromise yourself.
You are all you’ve got.    Janis Joplin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5