forced BE [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2013-08-01 13:59 (4714 d 19:53 ago) – Posting: # 11142
Views: 31,146

Dear sam!

❝ Hi John


So far as I know has our captain the name Großer Meister :-D.

❝ The ratio for AUCt and AUCinf are 83.82 and 84.91 and the corresponding CIs are (79.28% - 88.61%) and (80.68% - 89.35%) respectively. The subjects evaluated for this trial is 124.


That smells like forced bioequivalence. Not sure if FDA assessors like that (better quite sure they don't).

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
332 visitors (0 registered, 332 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:52 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5