forced BE [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2013-08-01 13:59 (4301 d 21:05 ago) – Posting: # 11142
Views: 26,085

Dear sam!

❝ Hi John


So far as I know has our captain the name Großer Meister :-D.

❝ The ratio for AUCt and AUCinf are 83.82 and 84.91 and the corresponding CIs are (79.28% - 88.61%) and (80.68% - 89.35%) respectively. The subjects evaluated for this trial is 124.


That smells like forced bioequivalence. Not sure if FDA assessors like that (better quite sure they don't).

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,671 registered users;
142 visitors (0 registered, 142 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:05 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you shut your door to all errors
truth will be shut out.    Rabindranath Tagore

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5