More questions.. [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2013-07-30 18:53 (4710 d 20:39 ago) – Posting: # 11131
Views: 24,736

Hi,

❝ ❝ ❝ 3. Have you checked the PK data in details, both pilot and pivotal.

❝ ❝ I have checked the Pilot and Pivotal data thoroughly.


❝ Any differences observed in Tmax or shape of C-t curve? That could give you an idea why the product behave was different.


One more.. How did the reference behave between pilot and pivotal studies under fasting and fed conditions? How close were the numbers (Cmax, AUC, Tmax)?

If the reference behaves "wildy" between pilot and pivotal studies then maybe you can use that to support the proposal for a repeat study? This is a sort of deadend thought.

Were the study population comparable? ie: males to female ratio.

John

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
140 visitors (0 registered, 140 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:32 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Competence, like truth, beauty and contact lenses,
is in the eye of the beholder.    Laurence J. Peter

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5