More questions.. [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2013-07-30 18:53 (4304 d 01:35 ago) – Posting: # 11131
Views: 20,119

Hi,

❝ ❝ ❝ 3. Have you checked the PK data in details, both pilot and pivotal.

❝ ❝ I have checked the Pilot and Pivotal data thoroughly.


❝ Any differences observed in Tmax or shape of C-t curve? That could give you an idea why the product behave was different.


One more.. How did the reference behave between pilot and pivotal studies under fasting and fed conditions? How close were the numbers (Cmax, AUC, Tmax)?

If the reference behaves "wildy" between pilot and pivotal studies then maybe you can use that to support the proposal for a repeat study? This is a sort of deadend thought.

Were the study population comparable? ie: males to female ratio.

John

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,671 registered users;
103 visitors (0 registered, 103 guests [including 61 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:28 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you shut your door to all errors
truth will be shut out.    Rabindranath Tagore

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5