Bad science [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2013-07-28 14:43 (4720 d 23:49 ago) – Posting: # 11084
Views: 25,338

Hi Sam,

CV of Cmax in the pilot was lower than CV of AUCt.
This is almost never the true case. My guess is the pilot trial gave you the wrong impression of the product performance; the two products are not equivalent as evident by the last pivotal trial.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
230 visitors (0 registered, 230 guests [including 20 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:32 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Try to learn something about everything
and everything about something.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5