Still many subjects… [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-05-28 14:56 (4367 d 05:28 ago) – Posting: # 10673
Views: 13,410

Hi Xipei,

❝ ❝ ... You would need a replicate design (preferably a full replicate: RTR|TRT or RTRT|TRTR). For the required sample sizes see sampleN.RSABE (FDA) and sampleN.scABEL (EMA).


❝ I tried both with CV=0.68. 42 subjects are needed for EMA, while only 27 subjects are needed for FDA. We plan to redo the BE study with a RSABE or SCABEL design.


Ok, but only if CFDA accepts scaling! I would rather opt for a four period full replicate design (sample sizes for ABEL 30 and for RSABE 20), ifThe partial replicate is statistically tricky. Another option would be a full replicate three period design (RTR|TRT), but it is not implemented in PowerTOST yet (though I expect similar sample size like in the partial replicate) and you have to adapt FDA’s and EMA’s code (easy).

If CFDA does not accept scaling and 75–133% is applicable for Cmax (your other post) you would need (T/R 0.95, CV 0.68, 80% power):
design       PowerTOST  n   treatments    power
RT|TR          2×2      92     184      0.805498
RRT|RTR|TRR    2×3×3    69     207      0.807633
RTR|TRT        2×2×3    68     204      0.801400
RTRT|TRTR      2×2×4    46     184      0.807602

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,671 registered users;
131 visitors (0 registered, 131 guests [including 82 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:24 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you shut your door to all errors
truth will be shut out.    Rabindranath Tagore

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5