Still many subjects… [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-05-28 14:56 (4771 d 14:37 ago) – Posting: # 10673
Views: 16,528

Hi Xipei,

❝ ❝ ... You would need a replicate design (preferably a full replicate: RTR|TRT or RTRT|TRTR). For the required sample sizes see sampleN.RSABE (FDA) and sampleN.scABEL (EMA).


❝ I tried both with CV=0.68. 42 subjects are needed for EMA, while only 27 subjects are needed for FDA. We plan to redo the BE study with a RSABE or SCABEL design.


Ok, but only if CFDA accepts scaling! I would rather opt for a four period full replicate design (sample sizes for ABEL 30 and for RSABE 20), ifThe partial replicate is statistically tricky. Another option would be a full replicate three period design (RTR|TRT), but it is not implemented in PowerTOST yet (though I expect similar sample size like in the partial replicate) and you have to adapt FDA’s and EMA’s code (easy).

If CFDA does not accept scaling and 75–133% is applicable for Cmax (your other post) you would need (T/R 0.95, CV 0.68, 80% power):
design       PowerTOST  n   treatments    power
RT|TR          2×2      92     184      0.805498
RRT|RTR|TRR    2×3×3    69     207      0.807633
RTR|TRT        2×2×3    68     204      0.801400
RTRT|TRTR      2×2×4    46     184      0.807602

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
169 visitors (0 registered, 169 guests [including 31 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:33 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5