... don't think so [NCA / SHAM]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2012-04-17 19:20 (4764 d 22:12 ago) – Posting: # 8435
Views: 13,089

Ah OK Simon,

❝ The 'problematic' bit is just understanding that IF the last scheduled timepoint is not quantifiable, WNL has an 'extra' parameter that crudely extrapolates from actual Clast to the NEXT sampled timepoint. The conc at that sample point had been set to ZERO in the raw data (...)


This approach probably leads to a systematic negatively biased AUCinf. I would say this could be considered a kind if imputation although a somewhat naïve one.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,666 registered users;
73 visitors (0 registered, 73 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:33 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Patients may recover in spite of drugs or because of them.    John Gaddum

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5