actual time for INPUT, nominal for the summarisation/report [NCA / SHAM]

posted by SDavis Homepage – UK, 2012-04-17 15:35 (4765 d 02:09 ago) – Posting: # 8430
Views: 14,387

Hi - I just warning people of the simple assumptions that AUCall makes as illustrated in this image http://www.pharmpk.com/pk/AUCinf.jpg
[image]

Basically draws a straight line to the next SAMPLED point from Tlast.

SO if we look at the 3 profiles below, Subject 1 and 2 since they are either sampled to, or beyond 24 h, but subject 3 is not quantifiable after 12h. The redline I drew on here (12-24h) shoes how AUCall would be described and you can see that it could be quite different to an AUC24 that have been calculated by extrapolating.[image]

Note in the NCA results AUClast=AUCall for Subjects 1 & 2 where last sampled point was quantifiable.[image]

Simon.

Simon
Senior Scientific Trainer, Certara™
[link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX-yCO5Rzag[/link]
https://www.certarauniversity.com/dashboard
https://support.certara.com/forums/

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,666 registered users;
57 visitors (0 registered, 57 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:45 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Patients may recover in spite of drugs or because of them.    John Gaddum

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5