actual times and AUC72 [NCA / SHAM]

posted by sciguy – Canada, 2012-04-02 22:44 (4779 d 18:34 ago) – Posting: # 8373
Views: 13,310

Hello Dr.Dan and d_labes!

❝ Do you refer to how to act in case of some time deviations at 72h?

❝ Use AUC up to the actual time (f.i. AUC0-73.5h) as your measure for AUC0-72h?


Yes, this is what I meant. I couldn't remember if AUC0-72 really means AUC0-72 or AUC0-72.xx (whatever your actual time at 72h is)

❝ My habit (and I know others here in the forum :cool:) was up to now to do an inter-/extrapolation to the scheduled time 72h and then calculate AUC0-72h with that inter-/extrapolated concentration.


I see...thanks for the link. I set up partial areas in WNL to define the actual time rather than inter/extrapolate at 72. Is it clear from a regulatory perspective (ie: FDA/EMA) that inter/extrapolation is required? Obviously, if time deviations are large, it makes sense to do this since there would be a major difference between AUC0-72 vs say, AUC0-76.3.

Thanks,
sciguy

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,666 registered users;
74 visitors (0 registered, 74 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:19 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Patients may recover in spite of drugs or because of them.    John Gaddum

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5