actual times and AUC72 [NCA / SHAM]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2012-03-27 11:22 (4786 d 07:47 ago) – Posting: # 8337
Views: 13,789

Dear Dan, dear sciguy!

The question and the answer are little bit ambiguous to me.
Do you refer to how to act in case of some time deviations at 72h?
Use AUC up to the actual time (f.i. AUC0-73.5h) as your measure for AUC0-72h?

My habit (and I know others here in the forum :cool:) was up to now to do an inter-/extrapolation to the scheduled time 72h and then calculate AUC0-72h with that inter-/extrapolated concentration.

This also is in accordance with Dan's excerpt of the EMA BE guidance, I think.

Of course this will usually not make a great difference if the time devs are small and the concentrations at 72h also.
The 'missing 72h' is inherently quite another cup of tea (see f.i. here).

But for other 'truncated' AUC also 'small' time deviations may be of great influence. Imagine early exposure partial AUC's, f.i. AUC0-30min.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,666 registered users;
58 visitors (0 registered, 58 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:10 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Patients may recover in spite of drugs or because of them.    John Gaddum

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5