Statistics in multiple dose study [NCA / SHAM]
Dear Ratnakar!
Some points:
Fine. Note, that some regulators are also interested in %PTF (Peak-Trough Fluctuation: 100[Cmax–Cmin]/Cav, where Cav=AUCτ/τ) and Cmin itself!
❝ [...] do we need to take blood samples till 5 half life of the drug and
❝ pre-dose sample also require to be taken prior to 4th day dosing? If we
❝ following parameters to be considered for BE Parameters to be calculated:
❝ Cmax
❝ AUCtau
❝ Tmax
❝ Kel
❝ and t1/2
Some points:
- You have to analyze the first pre-dose sample (day 1) in order to demonstrate lack of interferences in 'real-world' (not spiked) samples.
- You have to demonstrate that you reached steady state on day 4 - therefore some pre-dose samples prior to day 4 have to be analyzed (see this post or that one).
- Only if your drug shows no diurnal variability, the first 8 h profile on day 4 is sufficient. If your drug's PK is influenced by some circadian rhythms, you have to measure a full 24 hours cycle (i.e., three profiles). Nasty, because the number of samples might be limited and you still have to 'catch' Cmax. This might challenge the bioanalytical method, because the individual sample volumes have to be reduced in order to stay within the total volume of a blood donation.
- There is no need to sample beyond the profile's last time point. You can't get an unbiased estimate of kel in steady state by NCA-methods. Don't get confused by papers of the innovator: In an NDA studying elimination from steady state does make sense – if PK modeling is aimed at. In BE nobody is interested in this metric (except in Taiwan and China – see this thread).
- Don't use a washout – switch on day 5 directly to the other formulation (see this post).
❝ Bioequivalence to be concluded if the Cmax and AUCtau are within 80-125%.
Fine. Note, that some regulators are also interested in %PTF (Peak-Trough Fluctuation: 100[Cmax–Cmin]/Cav, where Cav=AUCτ/τ) and Cmin itself!
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- Statistics in multiple dose study ratnakar1811 2009-12-01 11:09
- Statistics in multiple dose studyHelmut 2009-12-02 00:20
- Statistics in multiple dose study ratnakar1811 2009-12-03 07:36
- Statistics in multiple dose study Helmut 2009-12-03 14:53
- Statistics in multiple dose study ratnakar1811 2009-12-04 08:21
- Statistics in multiple dose study Helmut 2009-12-03 14:53
- Metrics for multiple profiles d_labes 2009-12-03 08:58
- Metrics for multiple profiles Helmut 2009-12-03 15:50
- Metrics for multiple profiles d_labes 2009-12-03 16:02
- Metrics for multiple profiles Helmut 2009-12-03 16:11
- PTF is another story d_labes 2009-12-03 16:17
- PTF is another story Helmut 2009-12-03 16:42
- the flatter is better? d_labes 2009-12-04 08:46
- Biopharmaceutical history Helmut 2009-12-04 12:35
- the flatter is better? d_labes 2009-12-04 08:46
- PTF is another story Helmut 2009-12-03 16:42
- Metrics for multiple profiles d_labes 2009-12-03 16:02
- Metrics for multiple profiles Helmut 2009-12-03 15:50
- Statistics in multiple dose study ratnakar1811 2009-12-03 07:36
- Statistics in multiple dose studyHelmut 2009-12-02 00:20