Regulators truncated [NCA / SHAM]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2009-06-18 11:26 (5797 d 23:36 ago) – Posting: # 3872
Views: 31,830

Dear Ohlbe, dear Jaime, dear all,

let me share some experience with regulators in the EMEA. In a recent submission of a BE study with a long half-life product (t1/2 from literature about 50-70 h) we submitted an evaluation with AUC(0-72h), Cmax and tmax as metrics, the typical truncated area setting.

Regulators response:
The Germans asked for AUC(0-inf)!
The French asked for lamdaZ (kel) and t1/2!


Hopefully they will not ask for residual area <20% :angry: .

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
177 visitors (0 registered, 177 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:02 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you tell the truth you don’t have to remember anything.    Mark Twain

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5