Guidelines for Kel calculation [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2009-03-03 15:08 (5905 d 10:58 ago) – Posting: # 3309
Views: 3,376

Dear Łukasz!

❝ Does anyone know if there are any specific guidelines about calculation of elimination constant rate?


No specific text I know of – just ambigous wording like ‘a reliable estimate, :blahblah:.

❝ Specifically, is there any limit of correlation coefficient below which calculation of Kel should not be perfomed?


The correlation coefficient is a strange thing…
See this rather lengthy thread. All methods discussed there are available in the package bear for R (see here).

❝ Or is including all time points from elimination phase (e.g. 13 i.e. all after Tmax) to get correlation coefficient as close to 1 as possible acceptable?


I don’t think this makes sense. We want to get a reliable estimate of the elimination, not a correlation coefficient as close to 1 as possible. It’s evident that the closer you get to tmax, the more influentual the – still existing – absorption phase will be. But that’s another cup of tea. ;-)

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,668 registered users;
141 visitors (0 registered, 141 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:06 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Patients may recover in spite of drugs or because of them.    John Gaddum

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5