Don’t include tmax [NCA / SHAM]

posted by ryraman2661 – India, 2023-12-26 09:40 (494 d 03:28 ago) – Posting: # 23810
Views: 2,809

Dear Helmut,

Thanks for your reply on tmax.

In one study, we have drawn samples up to 96.00 hrs post dose. we have stated only Cmax and AUC(0 to t) as primary parameters for bioequivalence in our protocol. We have, mentioned AUC(0 to inf) as secondary parameter. Sponsor wants AUC also to be tested for BE criteria. Our statistician says, if we include tmax points for some subjects, it is passing. Shall we submit the AUC(0 to inf) data, (including tmax)?

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
202 visitors (0 registered, 202 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:09 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you tell the truth you don’t have to remember anything.    Mark Twain

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5