AUC * k [NCA / SHAM]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2021-10-01 15:52 (1309 d 22:22 ago) – Posting: # 22611
Views: 4,452

Dear both,

what do you think is a reasonable assumption about the distribution of the metric AUC*k?
Do we have to throw away our evaluation of BE studies assuming log-normal distri of the metrics AUC and/or Cmax?

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
182 visitors (0 registered, 182 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:15 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you tell the truth you don’t have to remember anything.    Mark Twain

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5