AUC * k [NCA / SHAM]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2021-10-01 15:52 (1355 d 04:41 ago) – Posting: # 22611
Views: 5,360

Dear both,

what do you think is a reasonable assumption about the distribution of the metric AUC*k?
Do we have to throw away our evaluation of BE studies assuming log-normal distri of the metrics AUC and/or Cmax?

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,674 registered users;
24 visitors (0 registered, 24 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:34 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

In matters of style, swim with the current;
in matters of principle, stand like a rock.    Thomas Jefferson

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5