old study re analysis [NCA / SHAM]

posted by MiLi – 2008-08-07 19:28 (6114 d 03:11 ago) – Posting: # 2161
Views: 5,947

Thanks for your answer.

❝ Sincere condolences. :crying:

:-(

❝ Interesting. I hope the protocol did state one metric as the main parameter - otherwise you will run into multiplicity issues.

❝ I guess you mean ⅓ of Cmax?


Yes, sorry

❝ Do I get you right: you 'see' increasing values in 1/6 of subjects?


Yes!!!

❝ What program are you using? Kel by definition is positive (denoting a transfer from the central compartment); all programs specialized in NCA PK analysis would come up with an error message.


I made the program myself with sas, maybe there are some errors in it but the results about elimination rate fit with the graphs. The data are really strange!!!

❝ There's an American phrase for it: 'Lights on, nobody at home.'


I think I see the idea but what does that precisely mean?! Thanks to increase my culture! :-P

❝ Forget it (sorry).


that's what i was afraid of. Thanks a lot

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,667 registered users;
77 visitors (0 registered, 77 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:40 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Patients may recover in spite of drugs or because of them.    John Gaddum

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5