old study re analysis [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2008-08-07 18:00 (6114 d 09:46 ago) – Posting: # 2160
Views: 6,046

Dear miLi!

❝ I am working on a old bioavailability study.


Sincere condolences. :crying:

❝ there is only 7 sample times. The first analysis has been done with incremental troncated AUC.


Interesting. I hope the protocol did state one metric as the main parameter - otherwise you will run into multiplicity issues.

❝ I have calculated AUCinf but the problem is that 1/3 of Tmax is at the last or the last but one sample time.


I guess you mean ⅓ of Cmax?

❝ The data even give some (1/6!!) negative Ke!!!


Do I get you right: you 'see' increasing values in 1/6 of subjects?

❝ It is not a problem in my program because you can verify it on graph.


What program are you using? Kel by definition is positive (denoting a transfer from the central compartment); all programs specialized in NCA PK analysis would come up with an error message.

❝ My question is : According to the study report, there has been no problem to perform the analysis on this data.


There's an American phrase for it: 'Lights on, nobody at home.'

❝ But, I wonder about the (poor ?) credit that we can give to the results of this first analysis.


Forget it (sorry).

❝ Sorry for my poor english.


No problem. If I misunderstood you, please correct me.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,668 registered users;
77 visitors (0 registered, 77 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:47 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

My doctor gave me six months to live,
but when I couldn’t pay the bill
he gave me six months more.    Walter Matthau

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5