old study re analysis [NCA / SHAM]
❝ I am working on a old bioavailability study.
Sincere condolences.

❝ there is only 7 sample times. The first analysis has been done with incremental troncated AUC.
Interesting. I hope the protocol did state one metric as the main parameter - otherwise you will run into multiplicity issues.
❝ I have calculated AUCinf but the problem is that 1/3 of Tmax is at the last or the last but one sample time.
I guess you mean ⅓ of Cmax?
❝ The data even give some (1/6!!) negative Ke!!!
Do I get you right: you 'see' increasing values in 1/6 of subjects?
❝ It is not a problem in my program because you can verify it on graph.
What program are you using? Kel by definition is positive (denoting a transfer from the central compartment); all programs specialized in NCA PK analysis would come up with an error message.
❝ My question is : According to the study report, there has been no problem to perform the analysis on this data.
There's an American phrase for it: 'Lights on, nobody at home.'
❝ But, I wonder about the (poor ?) credit that we can give to the results of this first analysis.
Forget it (sorry).
❝ Sorry for my poor english.
No problem. If I misunderstood you, please correct me.
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- old study re analysis MiLi 2008-08-06 10:56
- old study re analysisHelmut 2008-08-07 16:00
- old study re analysis MiLi 2008-08-07 17:28
- old study re analysis Helmut 2008-08-07 17:54
- old study re analysis d_labes 2008-08-08 08:42
- old study re analysis MiLi 2008-08-07 17:28
- old study re analysisHelmut 2008-08-07 16:00