Minimum AIC?! [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2008-02-03 14:49 (6299 d 19:08 ago) – Posting: # 1575
Views: 28,524

Dear Ohlbe!

❝ What about Akaike's criterion ?


Minimum AIC is only useful in selecting between rival models (e.g., in PK 1 2 compartments, in PD simple Emax sigmoidal Emax).*

For the example we get…
+-----+---------+---------+---------+---------+
|  n  |    3    |    4    |    5    |    6    |
+-----+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| AIC |  7.7894 | 12.3142 | 18.3473 | 20.9395 |
+-----+---------+---------+---------+---------+


… which would suggest n=3 as the ‘best’!
Looking at the definition of AIC
   AIC = n × ln (SSQ) + 2p
it’s clear that since in estimating lambdaz the number of estimated parameters p is fixed to 2 (intercept, slope) AIC essentially reduces to a transformation of the residual sum of squares times the number of data points.
AIC is a quite comfortable in compartmental modeling (as compared to the alternative F-test, because no calculations are needed), but in the given problem it does not help.

❝ I think Kinetica uses it, right ?


At least not in the estimation of lambdaz; strange enough there's a parameter ‘G’ in the output, which is neither described in the online-help nor the manual (v4.1.1, 2007).
I will try to find out the next days, what this parameter might be… :-D



Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,667 registered users;
66 visitors (0 registered, 66 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:57 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Patients may recover in spite of drugs or because of them.    John Gaddum

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5