What’s stated in the protocol? [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2014-06-20 17:20 (4017 d 06:14 ago) – Posting: # 13104
Views: 5,955

Hi Murthy,

❝ I have calculated Cτ,ss for a steady state study using the formula

❝ Clast*exp(-Kel(τ-tlast)) for the concentration data on day6.


That’s only necessary if you have deviations from the planned sampling time point.
Otherwise Ĉlast = Clast since

❝ The dosing interval for the study was 12 hrs and the sampling schedule on day6 is also having 12.00 hr and extended upto 36.00 hrs.


Hhm, generally one would not sample in steady state beyond the dosing interval. If the drug does not show diurnal variations in PK, the target metric for extent of BA would be AUC0–τ (and no need to sample a second profile on day 6). If the drug has time-dependent PK, the target metric would by AUC0–24 (i.e., cov­er­ing two pro­files). Generally after the first period one would directly switch to the res­pective other for­mu­la­tion. Since you sampled at 36 hours did you employ a full washout?

❝ I have refered the forum and the lectures given on these topics but i am not able to get conclusion on which data i have to perform BE for Cτ,ss.


Well, you should have stated the relevant PK metrics together with the method(s) of calculation already in the protocol, right? In analogy to AUC look at Ĉ12 or Ĉ24.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,675 registered users;
31 visitors (0 registered, 31 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:34 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Philosophy, like medicine, has plenty of drugs, few good remedies,
and hardly any specific cures.    Sebastien-Roch Nicolas de Chamfort

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5