Failing BE study due to AUCinf [NCA / SHAM]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2013-06-19 21:41 (4383 d 19:32 ago) – Posting: # 10828
Views: 8,354

Hi ElMaestro,

Fortunately I haven't encountered such problem yet but I have seen drugs with crazy AUCinfinity being reported ⇒ like T1/2 = 5000 hrs (the individual values should sig degree of variability but 5000 hrs is a bit ridiculous, if not BS) :confused:

Granted that it was a pilot study so I ended up playing with the data...

Thanks
John

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
35 visitors (0 registered, 35 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:14 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5