Failing BE study due to AUCinf [NCA / SHAM]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2013-06-19 19:44 (4382 d 17:10 ago) – Posting: # 10822
Views: 9,625

Hi everyone,

Just out of curiosity. Has anyone seen a BE study failing due to AUCinf falling outside 80-125% and the variability in the results seem to be attributed to the determination of Kel (jumpy concentrations)? Sampling timepoint setup was adequate in terms of capturing the terminal eleminaition phase of the PK profile. I wonder if there is any way to save this study.


Thanks
John

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,675 registered users;
30 visitors (0 registered, 30 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:55 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Philosophy, like medicine, has plenty of drugs, few good remedies,
and hardly any specific cures.    Sebastien-Roch Nicolas de Chamfort

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5