Lin-up/log-down trapezoidal example [NCA / SHAM]

posted by yjlee168 Homepage – Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 2013-05-25 21:45 (4361 d 13:09 ago) – Posting: # 10658
Views: 19,311

Dear Helmut,

I think the differences at elimination phase between linear and log-down may results from the degree of concavity ([C1-C2]) within a know time interval (t2-t1). I also did a simple test with two different scenarios:

** if t2-t1 = 12 h; C1 = 4.1, C2 =1.1 (the curve is more concave between t1 and t2)

  AUC(t1-t2) linear = 31.2; log-down = 27.362 (log-down should be more accurate in this situation)
 
** if t2-t1 = 12 h; C1 = 4.1, C2 =4.05 (the curve is less concave between t1 and t2; AUC(t1-t2) should be more close to real trapezoidal shape)

  AUC(t1-t2) linear = 48.9; log-down = 48.9 (before truncated was 48.89939) (the linear is supposed to be better than log-down; however log-down still keeps the accuracy as good as linear and almost as same as the linear.)
 

Therefore, you're right about log-down method. The log-down can be set as default method for AUC calculation safely, accurately and reliably.

All the best,
-- Yung-jin Lee
bear v2.9.2:- created by Hsin-ya Lee & Yung-jin Lee
Kaohsiung, Taiwan https://www.pkpd168.com/bear
Download link (updated) -> here

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,667 registered users;
66 visitors (0 registered, 66 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:55 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Patients may recover in spite of drugs or because of them.    John Gaddum

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5