handling of missing data [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2013-05-20 23:45 (4412 d 08:13 ago) – Posting: # 10609
Views: 20,636

Dear Gracehung,

❝ As in BE study, One sample’s actual sampling time was miss recorded. However as according to protocol, this sample was analyzed by our analytical laboratory.


I understand you question differently from Helmut. My understanding is that the sample was collected, but the phlebotomist failed to record the actual blood sampling time. In such a case I would just file a protocol deviation and re-train the staff, full stop. Even if there were a sampling time deviation, the influence on the AUC 90 % CI is so limited that it would only change the outcome of the trial in a very borderline situation.

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,675 registered users;
29 visitors (0 registered, 29 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:58 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Philosophy, like medicine, has plenty of drugs, few good remedies,
and hardly any specific cures.    Sebastien-Roch Nicolas de Chamfort

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5