Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • BE with 1 not included in CI -danish twist

BE with 1 not included in CI -danish twist [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by ElMaestro – Denmark, 2013-01-16 18:46 (4909 d 10:54 ago) – Posting: # 9873
Views: 6,938

Dear d_labes,

❝ Did you really forgot the Danish twist? Although the power calculation for their "BE decision rule" was implemented in the famous EFG? Can't believe that :-D .

Not forgotten, but ignored. I don't think the Dabish Authorities are enforcing the requirement. They would be hammered flat in a CMD(h) refferal should it come to that.

—
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

BE with 1 not included in CI ? Coja66 2013-01-16 10:12
- BE with 1 not included in CI ? ElMaestro 2013-01-16 11:38
  - BE with 1 not included in CI -danish twist d_labes 2013-01-16 15:07
    - BE with 1 not included in CI -danish twistElMaestro 2013-01-16 17:46
      - BE with 1 not included in CI -danish twist The Outlaw Torn 2013-01-17 13:27
    - BE with 1 not included in CI -danish twist bjkim97 2013-02-06 05:56
      - EMA widenend ABEL d_labes 2013-02-06 09:27