Variances from ABE: different model [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-01-15 19:09 (4502 d 12:33 ago) – Posting: # 9852
Views: 14,675

Hi John,

❝ Yes I confirmed your above values based on scaled ABE with SAS :-)


Nice. BTW, didn’t know that you have PHX 6.3 as well. ;-)

❝ Working backward on the 90% CI computation for the ratio of std deviation of within subject T/R... Your v1 and v2, the 2 degrees of freedom are 16 and 16 right?


Correct; n-m, where m=2 in the fully replicated. Therefore, my F-values are 2.333484 and 0.4285438 (from R, since not accessible in PHX).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
97 visitors (0 registered, 97 guests [including 64 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:43 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Don’t undertake a project
unless it’s manifestly important
and nearly impossible.    Edwin H. Land

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5