Got it. [RSABE / ABEL]
Dear Ben!
Definitely. I’m familiar with confusion I regularly cause in my presentations.
If you make clear that this is just an illustrative example – and not what the FDA actually requires – no problem.
❝ I want to present the two approaches to non-statisticians: […] I believe the 95% upper limit approach could cause confusion...
Definitely. I’m familiar with confusion I regularly cause in my presentations.

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- Replicate Design: Scaling FDA Ben 2012-10-23 11:32
- Maybe – but why? Helmut 2012-10-23 15:35
- Maybe – but why? Ben 2012-10-23 16:03
- Got it.Helmut 2012-10-23 16:23
- FDA Mixed up d_labes 2012-10-23 16:23
- FDA Mixed up Helmut 2012-10-23 16:34
- Maybe – but why? Ben 2012-10-27 17:04
- Maybe – but why? Helmut 2012-10-27 17:57
- Maybe – but why? Ben 2012-10-28 13:57
- Potvin (and beyond?) Helmut 2012-10-28 15:59
- Potvin (and beyond?) Ben 2012-11-01 10:17
- Potvin (and beyond?) Helmut 2012-10-28 15:59
- Maybe – but why? Ben 2012-10-28 13:57
- Maybe – but why? Helmut 2012-10-27 17:57
- Maybe – but why? Ben 2012-10-23 16:03
- Maybe – but why? Helmut 2012-10-23 15:35