Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Ref. vs. Ref. in partial replicate design

Ref. vs. Ref. in partial replicate design [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by ElMaestro – Denmark, 2012-10-10 14:39 (4600 d 21:00 ago) – Posting: # 9372
Views: 11,081

Dear d_labes,

I am sure you have a point - but I don't understand it. You are probably not wrong in any way, I am sure, but my walnutsized brain cut out when I tried to understand what you are trying to achieve.

Why not just extract model effects from the raw model fit without intercept?
I mean Foobar = lm(logY ~ 0 + Treatment + blahblah )
Then use the residual to get the CI?

In case the answer is somehow hidden in your first post I hope you can somehow reformulate (I hate that word, sorry) it so that I can understand.

—
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

Ref. vs. Ref. in partial replicate design d_labes 2012-04-25 15:52
- Ref. vs. Ref. in partial replicate design again d_labes 2012-10-10 10:56
- Ref. vs. Ref. in partial replicate designElMaestro 2012-10-10 12:39
  - Ref. vs. Ref. in partial replicate design d_labes 2012-10-10 16:26
    - Ref. vs. Ref. in partial replicate design ElMaestro 2012-10-10 17:16
      - R vs. R in partial replicate design d_labes 2012-10-11 09:43
        
        R1 vs R2 ElMaestro 2012-10-11 10:26
        
        R1 vs R2 d_labes 2012-10-11 12:01
        
        R1 vs R2 ElMaestro 2012-10-11 12:09
        
        R1 vs R2 d_labes 2012-10-11 12:46
        
        treatment df ElMaestro 2012-10-11 13:38
        
        Missunderstanding d_labes 2012-10-11 16:34
        
        Missunderstanding, crippled ElMaestro 2012-10-11 18:12
        
        EMA crippled method - R peculiarities d_labes 2012-10-12 14:54
        
        All is good, just forget ANOVA - you don't need it! ElMaestro 2012-10-12 16:25
        
        Just forget ANOVA. What next? d_labes 2012-10-15 08:35
        
        Just forget ANOVA. What next? ElMaestro 2012-10-15 10:04