Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Ref. vs. Ref. in partial replicate design again

Ref. vs. Ref. in partial replicate design again [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by d_labes – Berlin, Germany, 2012-10-10 12:56 (4599 d 11:26 ago) – Posting: # 9371
Views: 10,952

Dear ALL!

May I bring this post again to your attention? Any comments from the community? >900 views but no opinion?

BTW: My favourite method would be the evaluation via intra-subject contrasts.
Because it had the shortest CI :-D

—
Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Ref. vs. Ref. in partial replicate design d_labes 2012-04-25 15:52
- Ref. vs. Ref. in partial replicate design againd_labes 2012-10-10 10:56
- Ref. vs. Ref. in partial replicate design ElMaestro 2012-10-10 12:39
  - Ref. vs. Ref. in partial replicate design d_labes 2012-10-10 16:26
    - Ref. vs. Ref. in partial replicate design ElMaestro 2012-10-10 17:16
      - R vs. R in partial replicate design d_labes 2012-10-11 09:43
        
        R1 vs R2 ElMaestro 2012-10-11 10:26
        
        R1 vs R2 d_labes 2012-10-11 12:01
        
        R1 vs R2 ElMaestro 2012-10-11 12:09
        
        R1 vs R2 d_labes 2012-10-11 12:46
        
        treatment df ElMaestro 2012-10-11 13:38
        
        Missunderstanding d_labes 2012-10-11 16:34
        
        Missunderstanding, crippled ElMaestro 2012-10-11 18:12
        
        EMA crippled method - R peculiarities d_labes 2012-10-12 14:54
        
        All is good, just forget ANOVA - you don't need it! ElMaestro 2012-10-12 16:25
        
        Just forget ANOVA. What next? d_labes 2012-10-15 08:35
        
        Just forget ANOVA. What next? ElMaestro 2012-10-15 10:04