rounding or not? [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2012-10-01 16:06 (4608 d 22:17 ago) – Posting: # 9288
Views: 3,280

Hi Nee!

❝ The guideline says that 95% upper confidence bound should be less than or equal to zero. Is there any chance that the 95% upper confidence bound will be equal to zero?


Yes, although very, very small.

❝ How many decimal places should we keep for the same?


Good question! I guess most people calculate the CL in full precision and set up their software in such a way that a verbatim statement is printed. At least this is what I do. On the other hand FDA's SAS code for unscaled ABE does not include a rounding statement – which is required according to the [image] 2003 guidance. Since inclusion of the 90% CI requires rounding to two decimal places (i.e., four significant digits if <100% and five significant digits if ≥100%) rounding of the upper 95% CL to five significant digits may be an option. Interested in other opinions.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,668 registered users;
147 visitors (0 registered, 147 guests [including 52 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:23 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Don’t undertake a project
unless it’s manifestly important
and nearly impossible.    Edwin H. Land

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5