Ratio 125%: reformulate [RSABE / ABEL]
❝ If your observed T/R ratio is 125 %, your chances to get a 90 % CI within 80.00 - 125.00 % in the next study, even with a replicate design, are close to nil.
Thanks ohlbe,
Can I once again request you to please comment on my other query as below?
This is regarding a Modified release HVDP. If I check same batch of test and reference by both 2 way crossover and replicate design, what kind of differences in results can I expect? Basically I want to understand the impact of change in study design on BE results.
Thanks & regards,
drsinghs
Complete thread:
- Full replicate design PTM139 2012-05-03 06:01
- Full replicate design Dr_Dan 2012-05-03 15:14
- Full replicate design PTM139 2012-05-03 16:35
- HVDs/HVDPs: tricky business! Helmut 2012-05-03 16:58
- HVDs/HVDPs: tricky business! PTM139 2012-05-05 07:16
- HVDs/HVDPs: tricky business! drsinghs 2012-05-09 12:33
- Ratio 125% Helmut 2012-05-09 13:05
- Ratio 125% drsinghs 2012-05-09 13:41
- Ratio 125%: reformulate Ohlbe 2012-05-09 16:40
- Ratio 125%: reformulatedrsinghs 2012-05-10 05:49
- Ratio 125%: reformulate Ohlbe 2012-05-09 16:40
- Ratio 125% drsinghs 2012-05-09 13:41
- HVDs/HVDPs: tricky business! ElMaestro 2012-05-09 15:00
- HVDs/HVDPs: tricky business! drsinghs 2012-05-10 05:43
- Ratio 125% Helmut 2012-05-09 13:05
- HVDs/HVDPs: tricky business! Helmut 2012-05-03 16:58
- Full replicate design PTM139 2012-05-03 16:35
- Full replicate design Dr_Dan 2012-05-03 15:14