Reference Scaled Design [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by rajneesh singh – 2011-06-13 12:14 (5085 d 01:59 ago) – Posting: # 7112
Views: 5,682

Dear All,

Please any one suggest what are the main differences of Analysis for EMEA and USFDA Reference Scaled Study.

For USFDA, The 95% upper confidence bound for Square(YT -YR)-theta* within subject variability <=0
And the point estimate of the Test/Reference geometric mean ratio must fall within [0.80, 1.25]
For EMEA [U,L]= Exp[+/- k.swr] where k= 0.760,and swr = within subject variability of ln transformed of Cmax. CV % = 100*Exp(squre swr)-1 > 30% then our acceptance limit can be wide according to variability.

Is above main difference between USFDA and EMEA approach for reference scaled.

if else any other differences in approaches please suggest me. and how to do the analysis and any other criteria or any specification for regulatory also please suggest.


Thanks & Regards,
RS


Edit: Category changed. [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,669 registered users;
92 visitors (0 registered, 92 guests [including 58 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:13 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Don’t undertake a project
unless it’s manifestly important
and nearly impossible.    Edwin H. Land

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5