ln vs. log [RSABE / ABEL]
![[image]](img/uploaded/image3.jpg)
❝ At highschool in the UK [...] the term "log" pertained to a logarithm to the base 10.
❝ Now for a log to the base e (otherwise known as a natural logarithm or Napierian logarithm) we were taught to use the term "ln". They were first used by John Napier, who was a Scottish mathematician (late 17th century).
Yeah! I guess you’re still a patriot – even after your move to the former colonies!
BTW, in my posts I’ve used
ln
rather than log
in order to avoid any ambiguities (see also the label of the y-axis in my second plot above). I guess Detlew used log
assuming to be evident from the following exp
which kind is meant. In SAS and R/S+ log()
calls the natural logarithm – so we might be excused.Since I was trained as a chemical engineer, I’m used to switch my brain. In mechanical engineering and (in-)organic technology we used solely log10, because it’s easy to guess a value from the part before the decimal point: a log10 of 3.69897 means something between 103 and 104. Only an idiot savant can tell 103.69897=5000… In physical chemistry we used mainly ln; like in PK solving systems of differential equations is much easier in the ‘world’ of e. Well known exceptions in chemistry, where the decadic log is used are pK-values. Neutral pH means –log10([H3O+])=7 or 10-7 molar H3O+.
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- reference scaled bioequivalence AngusMcLean 2010-11-07 14:55
- reference scaled bioequivalence Helmut 2010-11-07 16:08
- reference scaled bioequivalence AngusMcLean 2010-11-08 22:22
- RSABE: FDA vs. EMA Helmut 2010-11-09 02:13
- Farside CV relabelling d_labes 2010-11-09 10:42
- Farside CV relabelling Helmut 2010-11-09 15:10
- Laszlo's constant d_labes 2010-11-09 16:46
- Farside CV relabelling AngusMcLean 2010-11-09 17:12
- Widened calculations step by step d_labes 2010-11-09 19:48
- Widened calculations step by step AngusMcLean 2010-11-09 20:46
- ln vs. logHelmut 2010-11-09 22:07
- ln on US calculators! d_labes 2010-11-10 08:31
- Spreadsheet addiction Helmut 2010-11-10 13:42
- Widened calculations step by step AngusMcLean 2010-11-09 20:46
- CV vs. sigma Helmut 2010-11-09 20:11
- CV vs. sigma AngusMcLean 2010-11-09 20:57
- log(e) vs. log(10) Helmut 2010-11-09 21:31
- slide 15 of the Pharsight presentation SDavis 2010-11-19 18:02
- CV vs. sigma AngusMcLean 2010-11-09 20:57
- Widened calculations step by step d_labes 2010-11-09 19:48
- Farside CV relabelling Helmut 2010-11-09 15:10
- one more ref. for the ref. list of RSABE yjlee168 2010-11-30 07:16
- Great! Helmut 2010-11-30 15:44
- Farside CV relabelling d_labes 2010-11-09 10:42
- RSABE: FDA vs. EMA Helmut 2010-11-09 02:13
- reference scaled bioequivalence AngusMcLean 2010-11-08 22:22
- reference scaled bioequivalence Helmut 2010-11-07 16:08