Mixed MoM [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2010-05-04 16:40 (5488 d 10:48 ago) – Posting: # 5285
Views: 35,986

Dear EM,

❝ Nice post d_labes,


Thanx for the flowers.

❝ Last, to address my own bonus question partially, I think there could be a practical difference between the FDA approach and the way by a Mixed Model. They may achieve exactly the same in the cases where there are no missing values.


That was also my opinion before. But what I liked to illustrate with my post is that this is not always true. We have here no missing values, balance also. But very different results of the first part of the scaled average BE criterion.

BTW: I'm not sure if MoM is a misnomer. But in the FDA guidance the analogous evaluation if the IBE and PBE criterion via sample statistics is named such.

BTW2: I'm not sure where the bear dataset comes from and if the described phenomenon is real or relies on an artificial dataset.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
136 visitors (0 registered, 136 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:28 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Only dead fish go with the current.    Scuba divers' proverb

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5