Factor 2 is unbiased [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2010-04-27 16:30 (5905 d 08:30 ago) – Posting: # 5248
Views: 41,848

Dear sailor and simulant,

❝ But what about this (page 5, emphasis in red by me):

From the dataset DGLM1, calculate the following:

❝ DGLM1: dfd=df;

s2wr=ms/2;


❝ Do you know how/what/why?


Here the analysis covers the differences R1-R2 which has expected variance =2*sigma2WR.
The trick of the GLM call (diffs versus sequence) gives the MS of R1-R2 "stratified" over the sequences (double sum in the formula for s2WR in step 1 on page 2 divided by (n-m)). You can verify this by conventional calculation.

Since I have answered your question I'm exempted from answering the bonus questions :-D.
To be honest: I don't know exactly. But I conjecture: Yes in balanced design without missings.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
333 visitors (0 registered, 333 guests [including 20 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:00 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Don’t compromise yourself.
You are all you’ve got.    Janis Joplin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5