FDA: TRT|RTR instead of TRR|RTR|RRT? [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2023-06-07 12:22 (1116 d 19:08 ago) – Posting: # 23579
Views: 3,736

Hi Brus,

❝ But nothing is said about the option full-replicate 3-ways, 2-sequences: TRT / RTR,……

Stupid enough. We may run into trouble if we have to assess the study in a partial replicate design for ABE because \(\small{s_\text{wR} < 0.294}\). See this article. At a webinar in March 2023 I tried to ask Donald Schuirmann.
The 👨‍✈️ steering moderating the »Panel Dis­cus­sions« decided to ignore my question… Instead, the only question related to SABE was “How is a Highly Variable Drug defined?”, which Donald explained at great length. Oh dear, what a waste of time!

❝ … which does seem to be included in the guideline Statistical Approaches to Establishing Bio­equi­valence.

Pragmatic: This one is the newest one. ;-)

❝ Does this mean that this design can no longer be used?

I don’t see any reason for not doing so. Why should we use an inferior method in lieu of a better one? If in doubt, initiate a controlled correspondence with the [image].

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
347 visitors (0 registered, 347 guests [including 28 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:31 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5