Advantages of a replicate design [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by H_Rotter – Germany, 2008-07-30 20:37 (6540 d 06:40 ago) – Posting: # 2110
Views: 6,067

Dear MGR,

in a three-period replicate design (e.g. TRT/RTR) you get not only CVintra (like in a 2x2 cross-over), but also the reference's (and test's) variability - which may be used in Reference Scaled ABE. Similarly in a four-period replicate design (e.g. TRTR/RTRT) you get the variability of both formulations, which may be used in Population and Individual BE.
Even in a conventional evaluation (ABE) of a replicate study, you are less prone to be hit by outliers. If a subject shows an irregualar response to a treatment compared to the rest of the study's subjects in one period only, you have strong evidence that a subject-by-formulation can be excluded. Sometimes FDA allows exclusion of the subject in such a case (the EU is more strict in this respect).

If you want to go with an extended acceptance range for Cmax (0.75-1.33) in the EU, you must demonstrate high variability of the reference in a replicate design pilot study (Q&A document):
8. What is a "highly variable drug or drug product?"
A drug product is called highly variable if its intra-individual (i.e. within-subject) variability is greater than 30%. A high CV as estimated from the ANOVA model is thus an indicator for high within-subject variability. However, a replicate design is needed to assess within-subject variability.


Regards,
Hermann

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
414 visitors (0 registered, 414 guests [including 28 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:17 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Don’t compromise yourself.
You are all you’ve got.    Janis Joplin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5