[Opinion] Should the 90% CI for GMR be required to encompass 1 [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2018-03-29 18:52 (3014 d 11:04 ago) – Posting: # 18616
Views: 14,467

So basically he's questioning the validity of FDA's 20% window on BE then...
John

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
209 visitors (0 registered, 209 guests [including 39 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:56 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It requires a very unusual mind
to undertake the analysis of the obvious.    Alfred North Whitehead

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5