TRT / RTR Design [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2017-05-06 20:33 (3338 d 23:07 ago) – Posting: # 17312
Views: 12,109

Hi ElMaestro & Yura,

❝ But having said that I think the sentence is OK, only the meaning is a bit out of context.


Right. It appears in the introduction about the FDA’s RSABE. Nothing like that in the next paragraph about the EMA’s ABEL. The GL states only the periods (three or four) and no specific designs/sequences. In the Q&A the RTRT|TRTR and the RRT|RTR|TRR are given as examples. In Rev. 12 of the Q&A the TRT|RTR is discussed (requiring at least 12 subject in sequence RTR).

❝ Blumentopferde :cool:


Love it!

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
371 visitors (0 registered, 371 guests [including 23 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:41 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Don’t compromise yourself.
You are all you’ve got.    Janis Joplin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5