TRT / RTR Design [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2017-05-04 00:04 (3342 d 04:39 ago) – Posting: # 17303
Views: 12,184

Hi Hötzi,

❝ ❝ "The approach of reference-scaled average BE (RSABE) requires that the reference formulation be measured twice in each subject."

❝ … slipped through my intention. My fault. This statement is – despite the two great authors – wrong.


Not your fault. As a reviewer you are not and will never be responsible for anything authored by others. :ok:

But having said that I think the sentence is OK, only the meaning is a bit out of context. To calculate meaningfully the intra-subject variability for Ref we need subjects in whom it has been measured (at least) twice. That was presumably what the authors tried to remind readers.
The entire issue of rsaBE cannot be approached in the absence of such subjects, and therefore the sentence makes quite some sense.

Blumentopferde :cool:
—
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
382 visitors (0 registered, 382 guests [including 25 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:44 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5