Case Study (FDA) [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2014-10-01 22:41 (3877 d 14:37 ago) – Posting: # 13637
Views: 7,925

Hi Luv,

❝ What was the ISCV observed?

❝ In one of our current study of DR pellets we got IntraSCV ~110% for reference and test (T/R min and max ranges was 8%-4000%) where as the interSCV was ~100% for both.


Not big, less than 20%, maybe like 15%? It was diltiazem. Basically we started the project with DR (or ER) beads in a capsule formulation but then switched to a tablet formulation containing the same ER beads (We called it a wax tablet). It was dead on bioequivalence with T/R Ratio like 95-99%.

John

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
170 visitors (0 registered, 170 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:19 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Only dead fish go with the current.    Scuba divers' proverb

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5