Case Study (FDA) [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by luvblooms  – India, 2014-10-01 08:24 (4287 d 18:40 ago) – Posting: # 13626
Views: 9,569

Hi HS,


❝ Absolutely. These are the highest numbers I ever have seen. BTW, AUC > Cmax


And that too in fasting condition.

I am now more worried about the variability in fed condition where there will be more variables (different gastric pHs, different gastric emptying rate, different gastric moment). Innovator has not done the fed study but FDA want generics company to do both the studies (here)

;-) With this variability, does it really makes a sense to run a pilot study using 18-24 volunteer?? As there will be no gurantee that a product formula comfortable in pilot will pass again in pivotal studies.

Or one shall simplay go ahead with the exhibit batches and take a rist with higher number of volunteers?

Tough times ahead.

~A happy Soul~

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
344 visitors (0 registered, 344 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:05 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5