IBE/PBE = Two-Stage [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2014-09-29 05:33 (3880 d 10:55 ago) – Posting: # 13611
Views: 12,173

Hi ElMaestro,

❝ One conclusion to draw is that the whole scaling business might not be that smart when it comes to type I errors.


Found a goody in Chow/Liu (3rd ed., but I guess you find it in the earlier ones as well). Chapter 19, Review of Regulatory Guidances on Bioequivalence, 19. Guidances on Statistical Procedures, 19.2.10 Two-Stage Test Procedure

   To apply the proposed criteria for assessment of PBE or IBE, the 2001 FDA guidance suggests that a constant scale be used if the observed estimator of σTR or σWR is smaller than σT0 or σW0. However, statistically, the observed estimator of σTR or σWR being smaller than σT0 or σW0 does not mean that σTR or σWR is smaller than σT0 or σW0. A test on the null hypothesis that σTR or σWR is smaller than σT0 or σW0 is nec­es­sarily per­formed. As a result, the proposed statistical procedure for assessment of PBE or IBE becomes a two-stage test procedure. It is then recommended that the overall type I error rate and the calculation of power be adjusted accordingly.


PBE and IBE were never seriously implemented, but with RSABE and ABEL we face the same shyte.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
130 visitors (0 registered, 130 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:28 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Only dead fish go with the current.    Scuba divers' proverb

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5