FDA: 90% CI for RSABE [RSABE / ABEL]
Hi Kumar,
Yes, that’s funny. See this thread and especially what John does.
I don’t think so. I would tick ☑ Yes in Table 3A and give in columns Ratio and 90% C.I.: NA. IMHO, it is sufficient to give the required information in Table 3B.
For the 90% CI in Table 3B use the intra-subject contrasts of the RSABE-code (Intermediate analysis – ilat). The statement
❝ […] filling of Table 3A and 3B of Model bioequivalence data summary tables-FDA.
❝ As per the form if Reference Scaled Average Bioequivalence Approach Used then complete Tables 3A and 3B
Yes, that’s funny. See this thread and especially what John does.
❝ In one of our study we used Reference scaled approach for all three parameters (Swr >0.294 for Cmax, AUCt and AUCinf). Then here should we also need to analyse these parameters using unscaled approach?
I don’t think so. I would tick ☑ Yes in Table 3A and give in columns Ratio and 90% C.I.: NA. IMHO, it is sufficient to give the required information in Table 3B.
For the 90% CI in Table 3B use the intra-subject contrasts of the RSABE-code (Intermediate analysis – ilat). The statement
cl alpha=0.1 gives you the 90% CI in log-scale. Back-transform it to raw scale.—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- Model bioequivalence data summary tables-FDA kumarnaidu 2014-08-20 07:04
- FDA: 90% CI for RSABEHelmut 2014-08-20 10:44
- FDA: 90% CI for RSABE kumarnaidu 2014-08-20 13:30
- FDA: 90% CI for RSABE Helmut 2014-08-20 14:10
- Not cast in stone jag009 2014-08-22 16:40
- Not cast in stone nobody 2014-08-22 17:17
- Not cast in stone jag009 2014-08-23 06:21
- Not cast in stone nobody 2014-08-22 17:17
- Not cast in stone jag009 2014-08-22 16:40
- FDA: 90% CI for RSABE Helmut 2014-08-20 14:10
- FDA: 90% CI for RSABE kumarnaidu 2014-08-20 13:30
- FDA: 90% CI for RSABEHelmut 2014-08-20 10:44
