FDA: 90% CI for RSABE [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2014-08-20 12:44 (4327 d 23:44 ago) – Posting: # 13411
Views: 9,366

Hi Kumar,

❝ […] filling of Table 3A and 3B of Model bioequivalence data summary tables-FDA.

❝ As per the form if Reference Scaled Average Bioequivalence Approach Used then complete Tables 3A and 3B


Yes, that’s funny. See this thread and especially what John does.

❝ In one of our study we used Reference scaled approach for all three parameters (Swr >0.294 for Cmax, AUCt and AUCinf). Then here should we also need to analyse these parameters using unscaled approach?


I don’t think so. I would tick  Yes in Table 3A and give in columns Ratio and 90% C.I.: NA. IMHO, it is sufficient to give the required information in Table 3B.

For the 90% CI in Table 3B use the intra-subject contrasts of the RSABE-code (Intermediate analysis – ilat). The statement cl alpha=0.1 gives you the 90% CI in log-scale. Back-transform it to raw scale.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
402 visitors (0 registered, 402 guests [including 21 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:29 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Ignorance more frequently begets confidence
than does knowledge.    Charles Darwin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5