FDA: NTID-RSABE [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2014-01-02 14:20 (4560 d 00:57 ago) – Posting: # 12125
Views: 6,715

Hi Manesh,
  1. Recommended (read: mandatory). You need a fully replicated design in order to assess 2.III. below.
  2. No. See the tacrolimus guidance and the SAS-code given in the guidance for warfarin. In order to pass BE, all of the following three conditions must be fulfilled:
    1. Upper 95% CL for (YTYR)2θ·s²WR ≤0,
    2. 90% CI ⊂ [80.00–125.00%],
    3. Upper 95% CL of σWT/σWR ≤2.5.
    For the statistical background see this presentation.

❝ […] what’s about other NTI drugs like Sirolimus, Everolimus etc.


Note that the guidances for sirolimus (10/2010) and everolimus (06/2012) were published before the first NTID-RSABE guidance (warfarin 12/2012). I would expect the same conditions as for tacro­li­mus to be applicable nowadays (these guidances are simply not updated yet). For everolimus see also this thread. If in doubt, ask the OGD.
BTW, don’t forget that the FDA requires tighter limits of actual content (batch-release) for NTIDs.


So far the EMA classified tacrolimus (Q&A document Ref. 2, 07/2010) and sirolimus (Product-Spe­ci­fic Bioequivalence Guidance, 11/2013) as NTIDs. Both are also classified as Critical dose drugs by Health Canada’s HPFP/TGD (02/2012).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
355 visitors (0 registered, 355 guests [including 21 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:17 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5